A story of yak shaving

I wanted to see the full pathname of the currently edited file in neovim, I found out it's ctrl+G.

But wouldn't it be nice to always see it?

sudo apt install vim-airline vim-airline-themes fonts-powerline
vim-addon-manager install vim-airline vim-airline-themes
echo "let g:airline_powerline_fonts = 1" >> ~/.vimrc

I recall one could also see the current git branch?

sudo apt install vim-fugitive
vim-addon-manager install vim-fugitive

Ooh, I remember I used to have pycodestyle highlighting in my code?

sudo apt install vim-syntastic
vim-addon-manager install vim-syntastic

A story of horror

Great! Uhm, wait, I recall syntastic had some pretty stupid checkers one needed to be careful of. Ah yes, it looks like I can whitelist them:

let g:syntastic_mode_map = { 'mode': 'active',
                           \ 'active_filetypes': ['python', 'cpp'],
                           \ 'passive_filetypes': [] }
let g:syntastic_python_checkers = ['flake8', 'python']
let g:syntastic_python_python_exec = '/usr/bin/python3'
let g:syntastic_cpp_checkers = ['gcc', 'clang-tidy']

Note, when I say "stupid", I mean something focusing way more on what can be done, rather than on what should be done.

I appreciate that a syntastic checker, that sends all of your current file to a remote website over http every time you open it or save it, can be written. I believe it should not be written, or at least not distributed.

Ok, now, how do I pass extra include dirs to clang-tidy? Ah, there is a config file system.

How does it work exactly?

Stupidly.

Lesson learned

Command line options should be treated as code, not as data.

Any configuration system that allows to inject arbitrary command line options to commands that get executed, should be treated as a configuration system that can inject arbitrary code into your own application. It can be a powerful tool, but it needs to be carefully secured against all sorts of exploits.

pdo debian eng sw

2018-04-04 09:48:03+02:00